Go back

1 April 2026

Capital Markets

Capital Markets

No Exit.
New Currency.

No Exit.
New Currency.

No Exit.
New Currency.

No Exit.
New Currency.

The coverage desert has created a universe of companies the market has structurally abandoned. The question is not whether they are undervalued. It is what mechanism most efficiently extracts and redeploys that value.

The coverage desert has created a universe of companies the market has structurally abandoned. The question is not whether they are undervalued. It is what mechanism most efficiently extracts and redeploys that value.

Read now

$2–3M

$2–3M

Fully loaded annual cost of being public for a company with $15M in EBITDA

Fully loaded annual cost of being public for a company with $15M in EBITDA

Zero

Repeat acquirers of sub-$300M, below-NAV public companies globally

60%

Of small listed companies receive no analyst coverage at all, per SEC staff data

The answer is not a research process, an activist campaign, or a traditional going-private transaction. It is a listed acquisition vehicle that uses its own shares as currency and capital recycling as its operating logic. That vehicle is Altuva.

This article examines why conventional responses to structural mispricing fall short, and how Altuva's listed holding company model provides a path no other counterparty in this segment can offer.

The analysis draws on SEC regulatory data, compliance cost benchmarking, and the structural mechanics of tax-free reorganisations under IRC Section 368.

This article examines the structural causes of persistent NAV discount in public equities and sets out why this condition has never been more pronounced than it is today.


The analysis draws on proprietary balance-sheet screening and third-party research from Research Affiliates, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Pzena Investment Management, and Russell Investments.

$723K

$723K

$723K

Average internal SOX Section 404 compliance cost for non-accelerated filers, per Protiviti's 2023 survey of 564 companies

Average internal SOX Section 404 compliance cost for non-accelerated filers, per Protiviti's 2023 survey of 564 companies

Average internal SOX Section 404 compliance cost for non-accelerated filers, per Protiviti's 2023 survey of 564 companies

3x

3x

3x

Typical enterprise value multiple for small listed companies versus 7–8x for comparable private businesses in the same sector

<300

<300

<300

Holders of record required to deregister under Exchange Act Rule 12g-4, a threshold that requires cash most controlling shareholders do not have

The Problem With Every Other Approach

The Problem With Every Other Approach

The Problem With Every Other Approach

The conventional responses to structural mispricing in public markets all carry the same limitation: they require capital upfront and return it slowly.

A traditional private equity buyer executes a cash tender offer, takes the company private, restructures over five to seven years, and exits via sale or IPO. The capital is locked up throughout. Going-private transactions trigger SEC Rule 13e-3 disclosure requirements, minority shareholder protections, fairness opinions, and frequently post-closing appraisal litigation. The economics work but require leverage, long timelines, and a concentrated bet on each deal.

A passive deep value investor buys the stock, publishes a thesis, and waits for the market to re-rate. Value realisation depends entirely on the market eventually agreeing, which, in the coverage desert, can take years or never happen at all.

At the end of 2024, the valuation discount of U.S. small-cap stocks relative to large-cap peers stood at approximately 40%, well below the historical median gap of roughly 5%, and sitting in the bottom 4th percentile since 1990. Global small caps now trade at discounts last seen only during the Nifty Fifty and dot-com eras — extreme episodes defined by irrational concentration at the top of the market.


In the United States, small caps trade at a 26% discount to large-cap peers on a price-to-earnings basis, excluding unprofitable companies, which is close to historic lows. Outside the U.S., international small caps, which have historically traded at a premium to local large caps, have flipped to an 8% discount despite offering higher forward earnings growth.


The numbers that matter most: more than 5,000 public companies globally trade below their intrinsic asset value. U.S. small caps have underperformed large-cap peers by approximately 103% cumulatively over the last decade. The Russell 2500 Value Index price-to-book ratio has fallen to multi-decade lows. And zero repeat acquirers of sub-$300M, below-NAV public companies exist globally. Not few. Zero.

Neither approach solves the structural problem. The company remains inside a public structure where listing costs run $1.5–4 million annually, no analyst covers it, no institution owns it, and its shareholders have limited exit options.

Neither approach solves the structural problem. The company remains inside a public structure where listing costs run $1.5–4 million annually, no analyst covers it, no institution owns it, and its shareholders have limited exit options.

Altuva Group - No Exit. New Currency.

Altuva Group - No Exit. New Currency.

The Cost of Staying Listed

The Cost of Staying Listed

The Cost of Staying Listed

The annual compliance burden on a sub-$300 million public company is material relative to its earnings base. Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance averages $723,000 in internal costs alone for non-accelerated filers, with total SOX-related spend including external audit typically running $500,000 to $1.5 million. Directors and officers liability insurance runs $200,000 to $1 million for small publicly traded companies, depending on size, sector, and litigation history. Audit fees at a PCAOB-registered firm run $300,000 to $800,000. IR, legal, SEC filing, and proxy costs add a further $300,000 to $600,000.

For a company doing $15 million in EBITDA, the fully loaded annual cost of being public is not unusual at $2–3 million. PwC separately found that approximately 60% of newly public companies spend more than $1 million annually on recurring public company costs.

Three structural forces have combined to create and entrench this mispricing. The first is the passive investing wave. Passive funds now account for approximately 62% of small-cap fund assets, up from 40% in 2014. Passive strategies cannot discriminate between a fairly priced company and one trading at 30 cents on the dollar of net asset value. Capital flows indiscriminately. The result is a systematic failure to correct prices that are obviously wrong.


The second force is the analyst coverage desert. While large-cap stocks are typically covered by an average of 16.4 sell-side analysts, small caps receive coverage from only about 5.7. For micro-cap companies below $300 million in market capitalisation, coverage thins further still, with nearly one-third covered by a single analyst or none at all. Markets are informationally efficient only where information flows. Where it does not, mispricing can persist indefinitely.


The third force is the M&A gap. Private equity firms in the U.S. alone sit on an estimated $1 trillion in dry powder. Yet that capital is systematically directed toward private businesses or larger public companies where deal economics justify the infrastructure costs of a major transaction. Sub-$300 million public companies fall below the minimum viable deal size for institutional capital. They are not overlooked because they are bad businesses. They are overlooked because the market has no systematic mechanism to unlock their value.

The Broken Equation

These costs made sense when the listing delivered something in return: access to capital markets, a liquid currency for acquisitions, a valuation premium from institutional ownership.

For many smaller listed companies, those benefits no longer reflect the reality of their position. The SEC's own data shows that small issuers received coverage from an average of two analyst firms versus nine for large issuers in the 2016–2020 period, and only 60% received any coverage at all. The compliance overhead remains. The institutional infrastructure that justified it has not.

The rise of passive investing, the retreat of sell-side analyst coverage from smaller companies, and the absence of systematic acquirers at the sub-$300M level are all durable features of modern capital markets, not temporary dislocations.


Research Affiliates projects that U.S. small-cap indexes can outperform large-cap peers by 4% annualised over the next decade, driven directly by the extremity of the current discount.

The Exit Path That Doesn't Exist

The Exit Path That Doesn't Exist

The Exit Path That Doesn't Exist

Consider a company generating $12 million in EBITDA, carrying no debt, and sitting on $8 million in cash. It trades at approximately 3x enterprise value, while a comparable private business in the same sector transacts at 7–8x. The gap is not explained by fundamentals. It is explained by limited exit options and structural neglect.

The owners of these companies face a problem that sounds simple but is genuinely intractable. The obvious answer, which involves delisting, selling the assets, and distributing the proceeds, is far harder to execute than it appears. Deregistering under the Securities Exchange Act requires reducing the shareholder base below 300 holders of record, the threshold set out in Exchange Act Rule 12g-4, effectuated through a Form 15 filing. That requires buying out minority shareholders, which requires cash the controlling shareholder typically does not have.

Even if they did, the process triggers SEC Rule 13e-3, requiring a Schedule 13E-3 filing, fairness opinion, and minority shareholder disclosure. These are costs that can render the transaction economically irrational relative to the company's market capitalisation. Investment banks will not take mandates at this size. PE firms will not underwrite the complexity. Strategic buyers rarely focus on smaller companies.

Altuva Group is a NASDAQ-listed permanent capital vehicle built to fill this gap. The platform acquires undervalued public companies using Altuva's own publicly traded equity as acquisition currency. This is not a fund with a fixed mandate and a finite timeline. It is a compounding vehicle designed to grow with every transaction.


By acquiring companies trading at 30 to 50 cents on the dollar of NAV using Altuva equity that trades at a meaningful premium to NAV, each deal is immediately accretive to NAV per share. The acquisition currency grows. The platform's capacity to execute the next deal grows with it.


The team brings over 160 years of combined experience in special situations, distressed investing, and complex capital structures, drawn from Oaktree Capital, Elliott Management, Brevan Howard, Cerberus, BlackRock, Macquarie, and Merrill Lynch, with more than $30 billion deployed across special situations globally.

The Altuva Approach

The Altuva Approach

The Altuva Approach

Altuva partners with boards and management of smaller listed companies to unlock value and restore shareholder value through tailored capital solutions. The process is confidential, structured around each company's specific situation, and designed to deliver transparent valuation within days rather than months.

The platform offers bespoke arrangements around each company's goals and shareholders. A full partnership sees shareholders exchange equity for Altuva shares and participate in the platform going forward. A carve-out structure allows management to retain core intellectual property or business lines while Altuva acquires the listed vehicle. A hybrid arrangement enables a partial roll into Altuva while management retains selected assets. One size does not fit all because the structure follows the situation.

What each arrangement shares is a common logic: transforming public equity into ownership in a disciplined, well-capitalised holding company. Shareholders transition from a single-asset position, often thinly traded, under-researched, and carrying the full weight of listing costs, to participation in an institutional-grade platform managed by specialists. They do not have to choose between cashing out and staying invested. Altuva's structure allows both.

Once Altuva acquires control of a target, a structured three-phase playbook executes. In the first phase (months two to four), the focus is stabilisation: eliminating cash burn, refocusing capital allocation on shareholder value, and reviewing assets and strategic alternatives.


In the second phase (months five to ten), the platform monetises liquid or non-core balance sheet assets, converting realised value into deployable capital. The asset triage process assesses each balance-sheet line item against whether it is productive, realizable, and essential to the ongoing business. Assets that fail the first two criteria are prioritized for disposition.


In the third phase (months eleven to twelve), cash is returned to the holding company, strengthening the acquisition currency for the next transaction. This is the mechanism that converts a single transaction's returns into a compounding capital allocation engine. The model requires no leverage, no forced exit timeline, and no growth assumption to generate returns. The value is in the assets already on the balance sheet.

The Platform Logic

The Platform Logic

The Platform Logic

The consideration Altuva offers is its own listed Nasdaq shares. Because Altuva is itself exchange-listed, those shares are liquid once any lock-up expires. This answers the core question of why a board would engage with an all-stock offer rather than waiting for a cash buyer that, in practice, is unlikely to appear. Share-for-share exchanges structured as statutory mergers or stock-for-stock exchanges can qualify as tax-free reorganisations under IRC Section 368, deferring capital gains for shareholders in a way that a cash transaction cannot offer. For founders and long-term holders, that deferral is worth material dollars.

At the end of 2024, the valuation discount of U.S. small-cap stocks relative to large-cap peers stood at approximately 40%, well below the historical median gap of roughly 5%, and sitting in the bottom 4th percentile since 1990. Global small caps now trade at discounts last seen only during the Nifty Fifty and dot-com eras — extreme episodes defined by irrational concentration at the top of the market.


In the United States, small caps trade at a 26% discount to large-cap peers on a price-to-earnings basis, excluding unprofitable companies, which is close to historic lows. Outside the U.S., international small caps, which have historically traded at a premium to local large caps, have flipped to an 8% discount despite offering higher forward earnings growth.


The numbers that matter most: more than 5,000 public companies globally trade below their intrinsic asset value. U.S. small caps have underperformed large-cap peers by approximately 103% cumulatively over the last decade. The Russell 2500 Value Index price-to-book ratio has fallen to multi-decade lows. And zero repeat acquirers of sub-$300M, below-NAV public companies exist globally. Not few. Zero.

The closer analogue is not private equity. It is John Malone's Liberty Media, a listed holding company that used its own shares systematically as acquisition currency across decades of compounding, exploiting the spread between public market prices and private market values.

The closer analogue is not private equity. It is John Malone's Liberty Media, a listed holding company that used its own shares systematically as acquisition currency across decades of compounding, exploiting the spread between public market prices and private market values.

Altuva Group - Platform Framework

Altuva Group - Platform Framework

Once Altuva partners with a company, a value unlock process follows. Balance sheet assets are stabilised and monetised. Operating units are refocused or optimised. Proceeds flow back into the platform. NAV per share accretes if, and only if, every partnership is executed below intrinsic value and the value unlocked exceeds the dilution cost of the shares issued.

This is the discipline the model demands. Every transaction is not just a sourcing exercise but an underwriting exercise. The spread between the valuation at which Altuva partners and the intrinsic value of the underlying business is the margin of safety that makes each partnership accretive to the platform rather than dilutive.

At the end of 2024, the valuation discount of U.S. small-cap stocks relative to large-cap peers stood at approximately 40%, well below the historical median gap of roughly 5%, and sitting in the bottom 4th percentile since 1990. Global small caps now trade at discounts last seen only during the Nifty Fifty and dot-com eras — extreme episodes defined by irrational concentration at the top of the market.


In the United States, small caps trade at a 26% discount to large-cap peers on a price-to-earnings basis, excluding unprofitable companies, which is close to historic lows. Outside the U.S., international small caps, which have historically traded at a premium to local large caps, have flipped to an 8% discount despite offering higher forward earnings growth.


The numbers that matter most: more than 5,000 public companies globally trade below their intrinsic asset value. U.S. small caps have underperformed large-cap peers by approximately 103% cumulatively over the last decade. The Russell 2500 Value Index price-to-book ratio has fallen to multi-decade lows. And zero repeat acquirers of sub-$300M, below-NAV public companies exist globally. Not few. Zero.

Why Boards Engage

Why Boards Engage

Why Boards Engage

The model only works if boards and management teams are willing to engage. That willingness rests on three things. First, Altuva is often the only credible counterparty with a clear and efficient path forward. Smaller listed companies with $5–50 million market caps sit in a no-man's land, falling below the threshold for PE interest, below the mandate of most institutional buyers, and carrying compliance costs that erode earnings regardless of business performance.

Second, the tax efficiency is real. A share-for-share exchange structured as a tax-free reorganisation under IRC Section 368 allows founders and controlling shareholders to defer capital gains that a cash sale would trigger immediately. For a founder with a low-cost basis in a company that has compounded for decades, that deferral is a material part of the value on offer.

Third, the structure preserves upside. Shareholders who receive Altuva equity do not exit at a single point in time. They participate in the ongoing growth of the platform, which, if the underwriting discipline holds, should accrete in value as each successive partnership adds to the NAV and the platform's institutional credibility grows.

At the end of 2024, the valuation discount of U.S. small-cap stocks relative to large-cap peers stood at approximately 40%, well below the historical median gap of roughly 5%, and sitting in the bottom 4th percentile since 1990. Global small caps now trade at discounts last seen only during the Nifty Fifty and dot-com eras — extreme episodes defined by irrational concentration at the top of the market.


In the United States, small caps trade at a 26% discount to large-cap peers on a price-to-earnings basis, excluding unprofitable companies, which is close to historic lows. Outside the U.S., international small caps, which have historically traded at a premium to local large caps, have flipped to an 8% discount despite offering higher forward earnings growth.


The numbers that matter most: more than 5,000 public companies globally trade below their intrinsic asset value. U.S. small caps have underperformed large-cap peers by approximately 103% cumulatively over the last decade. The Russell 2500 Value Index price-to-book ratio has fallen to multi-decade lows. And zero repeat acquirers of sub-$300M, below-NAV public companies exist globally. Not few. Zero.

Annual Cost of Being Public

  • SOX Section 404 compliance: $500K–$1.5M

  • D&O liability insurance: $200K–$1M

  • PCAOB audit fees: $300K–$800K

  • IR, legal, SEC filing & proxy: $300K–$600K

  • Total for ~$12M EBITDA company: $2–3M annually

  • U.S. small-cap P/E discount to large caps: 26% (ex-unprofitable)

  • International small-cap discount to local large caps: 8%

  • Passive funds' share of small-cap assets: 62% (up from 40% in 2014)

  • Average analyst coverage, large caps: 16.4 analysts

  • Average analyst coverage, small caps: 5.7 analysts

  • Micro-caps with one analyst or fewer: approximately one-third

  • U.S. private equity dry powder: ~$1 trillion

The Valuation Gap

3x

EV multiple for typical small listed company

7–8x

EV multiple for comparable private businesses transacting in the same sector

$30B+

Combined capital deployed by the team across special situations globally


160 yrs

Combined team experience in special situations and distressed investing

Structure Options

  • Full partnership: Equity exchange for Altuva shares

  • Carve-out: Retain IP or business lines, Altuva acquires listed vehicle

  • Hybrid: Partial roll, management retains selected assets

  • ~$90M in annual revenue

  • $15M in adjusted EBIT

  • 7+ completed acquisitions

  • 15+ global markets

  • 9-year operating track record

  • Software and digital commerce focus

Three Reasons Boards Engage

  • Only credible counterparty at this market cap range

  • Tax-free reorganisation under IRC Section 368 defers capital gains

  • Equity in a growing platform. Upside preserved, not extinguished

The Analogue

  • Liberty Media: Listed holding company, shares as currency, decades of compounding

  • Berkshire Hathaway: Partnerships funded by platform equity, value redeployed into next opportunity

  • Applied here to sub-$300M companies the research economy has structurally underserved

What Separates This
From Everything Else

What Separates This From Everything Else

What Separates This
From Everything Else

What Separates This
From Everything Else

Each conventional alternative to Altuva's model breaks down on at least one of these dimensions. The all-stock platform structure is the only approach that resolves all four simultaneously for companies in the sub-$300 million segment.

Each conventional alternative to Altuva's model breaks down on at least one of these dimensions. The all-stock platform structure is the only approach that resolves all four simultaneously for companies in the sub-$300 million segment.

Each conventional alternative to Altuva's model breaks down on at least one of these dimensions. The all-stock platform structure is the only approach that resolves all four simultaneously for companies in the sub-$300 million segment.

01

01

Equity-Like Upside

Returns are driven by the spread between acquisition price and intrinsic value rather than by leverage ratios or exit multiples dependent on debt markets. Shareholders participate in the platform's compounding NAV instead of a single-point realisation event.

Returns are driven by the spread between acquisition price and intrinsic value rather than by leverage ratios or exit multiples dependent on debt markets. Shareholders participate in the platform's compounding NAV instead of a single-point realisation event.

02

02

Immediate Nasdaq Liquidity

Altuva's own exchange listing means the shares offered as consideration are liquid once any lock-up period expires. This answers the board's most fundamental question: what can shareholders do with this after the deal closes?

Altuva's own exchange listing means the shares offered as consideration are liquid once any lock-up period expires. This answers the board's most fundamental question: what can shareholders do with this after the deal closes?

03

03

No Capital Constraint

The all-stock transaction mechanic allows the platform to scale without the capital constraints that limit every cash-based alternative. Each partnership strengthens the platform's currency rather than depleting its reserves.

The all-stock transaction mechanic allows the platform to scale without the capital constraints that limit every cash-based alternative. Each partnership strengthens the platform's currency rather than depleting its reserves.

04

04

Tax Deferral for Founders

Share-for-share exchanges structured as tax-free reorganisations under IRC Section 368 allow founders and long-term holders to defer capital gains that a cash transaction would trigger immediately, which is a material component of the value on offer.

Share-for-share exchanges structured as tax-free reorganisations under IRC Section 368 allow founders and long-term holders to defer capital gains that a cash transaction would trigger immediately, which is a material component of the value on offer.

05

05

Board-Friendly Process

Altuva's process is confidential and structured around each company's specific situation. There is no public campaign, no adversarial proxy contest, and no requirement for management to publicly signal distress. The path is designed to be taken quietly.

Altuva's process is confidential and structured around each company's specific situation. There is no public campaign, no adversarial proxy contest, and no requirement for management to publicly signal distress. The path is designed to be taken quietly.

06

06

Platform Compounding

Capital recycled from each partnership funds the next acquisition. The model is self-financing at scale. The constraint is not capital availability but rather execution velocity and governance quality, which Altuva controls directly.

Capital recycled from each partnership funds the next acquisition. The model is self-financing at scale. The constraint is not capital availability but rather execution velocity and governance quality, which Altuva controls directly.

Screening Framework

How Altuva Underwriters

Evaluate Discount Quality

Approach

Capital Required

Timeline to Value

Tax Efficiency

Board Suitability

Altuva All-Stock Merger

None, shares as currency, no cash required from either party

Days to transparent valuation; value realised through platform compounding

Qualifies as IRC Section 368 tax-free reorganisation, capital gains deferred

Optimal

Private Equity Going-Private

Significant, cash tender, leverage, fairness opinion, appraisal litigation risk

5–7 years capital lockup; uncertain exit environment

None, cash consideration triggers immediate capital gains recognition

Complex

Passive Deep Value Investor

None for target, but no mechanism to force value realisation

Indefinite, re-rating depends entirely on market changing its view

N/A, no transaction, no tax event until shareholder sells independently

Passive

Deregister / Go Dark

High, must buy out minority holders to drop below 300 record holders

Legally complex; triggers Rule 13e-3, fairness opinion, SEC disclosure

Cash buyout of minorities triggers gains; no deferral mechanism

Prohibitive

Remain Listed (Standalone)

None from M&A, but $1.5–4M annual compliance costs erode earnings

No path to value realisation; discount persists or widens

N/A, no transaction; shareholders accumulate listing costs with no offset

Costly

The Counterparty That
Didn't Exist

The Counterparty That
Didn't Exist

The Counterparty That
Didn't Exist

The coverage desert did not form overnight. The broker-dealer network that contracted over sixteen years, the passive capital that displaced active stock-pickers, and the research infrastructure that was dismantled are structural shifts embedded in how the market now operates.


The companies sitting in the sub-$300 million universe are operating, generating cash, and carrying value that the market has structurally stopped accounting for.

Their shareholders have limited exit options, no analyst coverage, and no institutional buyer willing to engage at their size. The sourcing edge the coverage desert provides is not based on superior information. It is based on the fact that the market has structurally stopped looking, and the spread between market price and intrinsic value in this segment is, as a result, demonstrably and persistently large.


Altuva is the counterparty that does not otherwise exist. We are a listed, board-friendly platform that partners with management to unlock that value and restore it to shareholders through tailored capital solutions built specifically for the part of public equity that everyone else has left behind.


That is what Altuva was built to do.

Sources & Footnotes

  1. SEC Rule 13e-3 and Schedule 13E-3: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 13e-3. Rivelès Law Group, "Going Private Transactions, An Overview," 2017. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, "Going Private Transactions," April 2020.

  2. Protiviti, "2023 Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Survey," September 2023. Non-accelerated filer internal SOX compliance costs average $723,100; companies under $500M average $651,000 (n=564). GAO-25-107500, "Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Compliance Costs Are Higher for Larger Companies but More Burdensome for Smaller Ones," 2025.

  3. Woodruff Sawyer, "D&O Looking Ahead Guide 2025"; "D&O Looking Ahead Guide 2026." ProWriters Insurance, "D&O Insurance Costs and Trends 2024." Premium levels vary by size, sector, claims history, and market cycle.

  4. GuzmanGray, "Public Company Audit Costs and Fees Guide 2024." Audit Analytics, "2018–2019 IPO Accounting and Legal Fees," February 2020.

  5. PwC, "Considering an IPO? The Costs of Going and Being Public." Approximately 60% of newly public companies surveyed spent more than $1 million annually on recurring public company costs.

  6. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Report, "Issues Affecting the Provision of and Reliance Upon Investment Research Into Small Issuers," February 18, 2022.

  7. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 12g-4; Exchange Act Rule 12g5-1. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, "Going Dark: Deregistration in the COVID-19 Era," 2020. Securities Law Blog, "Termination of Registration Under Section 12," November 2022.

  8. Rivelès Law Group, ibid. Houlihan Capital, "Fairness Opinions: Going Private vs. Going Dark," 2018. For companies in the $10–30M market cap range, total legal, advisory and regulatory costs are often prohibitive relative to deal size.

  9. Internal Revenue Code Section 368(a). Under 368(a)(1)(A) (statutory merger) and 368(a)(1)(B) (stock-for-stock exchange), properly structured share-for-share acquisitions can qualify as tax-free reorganisations. Fourscore Business Law, "Tax-Free Reorganization Basics," January 2024. IRS, 26 U.S. Code § 368.

  10. Bloomberg, "Breaking Down John Malone's Investments, Company by Company," 2018. Wikipedia, "Liberty Media," accessed March 2026. Variety, "John Malone's Liberty Broadband, Charter in Talks for Merger," September 2024.

  11. Warren E. Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway Annual Letters to Shareholders, 1977–present. Available at berkshirehathaway.com.

What is your company's
true value?

What is your company's
true value?

What is your company's
true value?

A 30-minute call is all it takes.

A 30-minute call is all it takes.

A 30-minute call is all it takes.

Book an introductory call

Strictly confidential

No obligation

No
obligation

No public disclosure

No disruption to operations

Strictly confidential

No public disclosure

No obligation

No disruption to operations

Altuva Group Logo

Altuva Group

Altuva Group Logo

Altuva Group

Altuva Group Logo

Altuva Group